EVE Search - Isn't it about time local was changed to delayed mode already ?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Isn't it about time local was changed to delayed mode already ?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.08.15 16:26:00 - [1] Originally by: Ji Sama Fail troll Akita T detected -10/10 Also. Fixed, nice aren't I? Don't want local? Minimise it.
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.08.15 16:48:00 - [2] Edited by: Super Whopper on 15/08/2010 16:50:16 Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Super Whopper Don't want local? Minimise it. Sure, give me a button that lets me minimize local for all other pilots in the system The moment you give me all your stuffz is the moment you stop caring about local. Alternative: Cry the river you're crying Build a bridge over the river Jump off said bridge ??? Profit for us.
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.08.16 02:15:00 - [3] I can't believe you guys are still responding to this thread. Let me explain Akita's motives. - Akita wants CCP to remove local in 0.0 so they kill whatever's keft of EVE, they're doing that anyway so why not help them a little? - Akita is a troll.
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.08.16 09:45:00 - [4] Originally by: Emperor Cheney 1) Akita has a long history of posting some of the most thoughtful pieces on these boards. Calling him/her (statistically, him) a troll just belies your lack of effective argument. 2) Googling your username + "battleclinic," I do not think you know how to play this game very well, if at all, and consequently your ideas on what would make this game better or worse are hard to take seriously. While you're wasting your life away staring at killboards I have been reading the bitter tone of his posts.
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.08.16 10:36:00 - [5] Edited by: Super Whopper on 16/08/2010 10:38:10 Originally by: Emperor Cheney Yes, because I mentioned battleclinic, it stands to reason that I spend 16 hours a day, 7 days a week with my eyes glued to killboards. Good call, and an effective rebuttal. Also, because you think someone is "bitter," therefore they are a "troll" and have no argument. Here is how it is: Akita may or may not be bitter. I don't think he is, but whatever. Maybe Akita is bitter. And mad. And crying, right now. None of that detracts or adds to anyone's argument. He is putting forth an argument. All you are doing is going "TROLL TROLL I AIN'T LISTENING" (which, incidentally, does not lend credence to the idea that the other guy is the bitter one, for what it's worth). 0/10 Raise your intelligence level before poasting whatever argument you're trying to put forth. And you want credence? Post something people care about, this horse was flogged to death years ago. It's obvious you haven't been playing long, or else you'd know this nonsensical argument has been discussed for years and years and you know what the conclusion is? That you fail and need to find something new to fight for because this proposal died long, long ago. But what hasn't died is Akita's trolling. Originally by: Flibertygibbet how about instead of local, just make everyones ship explode. Best proposal so far. Upon undock your ship goes boom.
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.08.19 12:21:00 - [6] Originally by: Ori Blake 1. Big alliances get more powerful since only they have the manpower to maintain scouts on gates for intel. 2. Solo players and small groups will get more risk when ratting or plexing. 3. Wardecced players would find out that stations are deathtraps since they can't check local to see if a wt is camping outside. 4. Players would get more risk averse due to lack of intel. 5. Revamping dscan to show needing standing info would put a strain on server resources. 6. Dscan can't differentiate between piloted or non piloted ships, is clogged with wreck and pos info as well. Systems with many ships would make active scanning near impossible. 7. Hitting a button every 5 seconds isn't good gameplay. 8. It would give way too much power to cov ops ships since cloaks wont show up on d-scan at all. No other tool but local exists to deal with cloaked ships. Some bad reasons off the top of my head. If you want to convince me you need to give more of a postitive case for local and why lessening intel will make the game better for many people. But it would fix the lag in 0.0 would it not? And then carebears running their lvl 4's will finally experience the lag we experience and they won't even have to be in a fleet fight for it This thread is a stealth nerf 0.0 and low sec whine.
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.08.19 16:23:00 - [7] If local got removed everyone would switch to one of the many programs that report local count. There're many and I know a guy who has made two, of which one is excellent. I will not reveal his identity but if local were to be removed only the wise (those with programs running) will surive and these little ebil piwates thinking they're the only ones with them will still be left crying. The only difference will be that half of 0.0 will be even more empty. I say CCP should do it, they're trolling us as it is with their "We'll probably consider thinking about thinking about EVE in 18 months." schedule. This will just kill 0.0 and we can all go play other games. AmIdoingitright?
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.08.27 01:15:00 - [8] This troll thread by Akita is still going and people are still biting Akita simply wants CCP to self destruct and delayed mode/no local in 0.0 is the perfect way to force everyone back to high sec so his missions are boosted. Well done Akita, this, for once, is a 'successful' thread, not that you won't be anything more than a troll.
Super Whopper I can Has Cheeseburger	Posted - 2010.08.28 04:44:00 - [9] Originally by: Allestin Villimar I have. I see a lot of back and forth bickering with little actual argument being presented on either side. I also haven't seen any recommendations that would actually work without being a massive drain on bandwidth and wouldn't utterly destroy the low sec / 0.0 population. But those proposals won't do because they don't totally destroy 0.0. Imagine the following scenario. CCP destroy 0.0 by making it as populated as WH's by removing local/making it delayed. Clever emo girls like Akita will buy officer/faction drops and wait for them to become almost extinct and then will sell them, making tens of billions of profit. Thus achieving three things: 0.0 dies, people leave EVE and transparent people like Akita make more than they'll ever need. Unfortunately for them CCP aren't entirely ******ed (despite them having said they will probably consider thinking about looking at EVE in 18 months time) and will never implement this. Thus, all that's left to little tragic wannabe piwates is to whine, whine some more and whine ever mooaar about 0.0 and local. Because, you see, the only people who will survive in 0.0 then are those who suffer from some disorder and feel compelled to click scan in their DScan every 5 seconds or those with little nifty programs that will tell them where everything is at all times. But don't let your obvious failure at EVE prevent you from ing more because that's all you can do, Akita, alts, noob followers of his and wannabe failed pvpers.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.